Are Small-Cap Stocks Riskier? Small Caps vs the S&P 500 in Every Crash Since 2008
Add us as a preferred source on GoogleSmall companies are often described as the stock market's high-beta corner: they fall harder when markets crash and bounce back harder when they recover. It is one of the most repeated ideas in investing, and the main reason given for owning them is that, over very long periods, small companies have sometimes earned more than large ones.
This guide checks the first half of that idea against the record. It looks at what two widely held small-cap funds did, by price, in each stock market crash since 2008 compared with the S&P 500, how long each took to get back to its old high, and why the two funds did not always behave alike. Educational, not a recommendation.
What counts as a small-cap stock
Cap is short for market capitalization, the total value of a company's shares. Large caps are the giants that dominate the S&P 500. Small caps are companies worth roughly a few hundred million to several billion dollars: regional banks, smaller manufacturers, retailers, biotech firms and thousands of businesses most people have never heard of.
Two indexes are the usual way to own them. The Russell 2000 holds the smaller two thousand of the three thousand largest US companies, and is tracked by the IWM fund. The S&P SmallCap 600 holds fewer companies and adds a test the Russell 2000 does not: a company generally needs a record of positive earnings before it is added. It is tracked by the IJR fund. That one rule turns out to matter.
What small caps did in every crash since 2008
Over the months the S&P 500 fell from its peak to its bottom in each crash, here is how the two small-cap funds moved.
In the 2008 financial crisis the S&P 500 fell about 56% and the Russell 2000 about 59%. In the late-2018 selloff the gap was wider: about 20% for the market against about 26% for small caps. In the 2020 COVID crash the S&P 500 fell about 34% and small caps about 41%.
In 2022 the Russell 2000 ended the window about level with the market, down about 26% against about 25%, though its lowest point along the way was a little deeper, about 27%. On this record, the reputation holds: in three of four crashes small caps fell clearly further, and in the fourth they did not fall less.
The bounce back is not guaranteed
The second half of the reputation is the faster rebound, and here the record is mixed. After 2008 it held: the Russell 2000 got back to its old price high about 25 months after the bottom, against about 48 months for the S&P 500, roughly half the time, even though it had fallen a little further.
After every crash since, it went the other way. After the late-2018 selloff the S&P 500 was back at its high in about 4 months, while small caps took about 23 and only got there after the 2020 crash had come and gone. After 2020 small caps took about 8 months against about 5, and after 2022 about 28 months against about 15, as the largest companies led the market back up.
| Crash | S&P 500 (SPY) | Russell 2000 (IWM) | S&P 600 (IJR) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | 48 | 25 | 25 |
| 2018 fourth-quarter selloff | 4 | 23 | 23 |
| 2020 COVID crash | 5 | 8 | 8 |
| 2022 bear market | 15 | 28 | 22 |
Why small caps tend to fall harder
Small companies usually have less of a cushion. They tend to rely more on borrowing, often at rates that rise when the central bank raises its rate, and they have fewer ways to raise money when lenders get nervous. Many sell mainly in one country or one product line, so a recession at home hits them directly. And a larger share of small companies are not profitable at all, so they depend on credit staying open and on investors staying patient.
Big companies are not immune to any of this, but in a panic investors tend to sell what looks fragile first and hold on to the firms with large cash piles and steady profits.
The index you pick matters
The two small-cap funds tracked each other closely in 2008, 2018 and 2020. They split in 2022. The S&P 600, with its earnings test, fell about 23% over the window, less than both the Russell 2000's 26% and the S&P 500's 25%, and it got back to its old high in about 22 months against about 28 for the Russell 2000.
2022 was a year of sharply rising interest rates, which hit companies without profits hardest, because their value rests on earnings far in the future and they need to keep borrowing to get there. One crash is not proof of a rule, but it is a reminder that a small-cap fund is a set of rules about which companies get in, and the rules shape the ride.
What owning more small caps means
The long-run case for small caps is the size premium: studies of decades of US data found that small companies earned more than large ones on average, partly as payment for the extra risk. The premium has been far from steady. Over most of the years since 2010, large companies, led by technology, have generally outpaced small ones, and there have been other long stretches where small caps lagged.
You also already own small caps if you hold a total-market fund. They make up only a small slice of it, because the fund weights each company by its size. A separate small-cap fund is a tilt on top of that.
- •What is it for? A small-cap tilt is a bet on a long-run premium that has come and gone, and on this record it has usually made crashes somewhat deeper, not shallower.
- •Can you wait? After three of the last four crashes, small caps took longer than the market to get back to their old high. A tilt suits money you will not need for many years.
- •Rebalancing: in a crash the small-cap slice will fall below its target. Topping it back up is where much of any rebound benefit comes from, and it takes nerve to do.
Test it on your own portfolio
The useful question is not whether small caps are good, but what a small-cap tilt would do to your mix. Backtest your portfolio as it is and with a slice moved into a small-cap fund, and compare the maximum drawdown, the recovery time and the total return over the whole period. Then replay both versions through 2008, 2020 and 2022 in the stress test, and try the same tilt with each of the two indexes.
Educational, not advice: whether small caps belong in your portfolio depends on your goals, your horizon and everything else you own.
Try it yourself
FAQ
- Are small-cap stocks riskier than large caps?
- On the record since 2008, yes, by price. The Russell 2000 fell further than the S&P 500 in 2008, 2018 and 2020, for example about 41% against about 34% in the 2020 crash, and fell about as much in 2022. Small caps also tend to swing more from month to month in ordinary years.
- Do small caps recover faster after a crash?
- Sometimes. After 2008 the Russell 2000 got back to its old high in about 25 months against about 48 for the S&P 500. After 2018, 2020 and 2022 it took longer than the market, about 28 months against 15 after 2022.
- What is the difference between IWM and IJR?
- IWM tracks the Russell 2000, the smaller two thousand of the three thousand largest US companies. IJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600, which holds fewer companies and generally requires a record of positive earnings before adding one. They behaved alike in most crashes, but in 2022 the S&P 600 fell less and recovered sooner.
- Do small caps do well in a recession?
- Usually not while it is happening: small companies tend to be hit harder by falling sales and tighter credit. Small caps have sometimes rebounded strongly early in a recovery, as after 2008, but that pattern did not repeat after the more recent crashes.
- Should I add small-cap stocks to my portfolio?
- This guide cannot answer that for you. Small caps add a different kind of company to a portfolio dominated by giants, and some investors tilt toward them for the long-run size premium, but that premium has been inconsistent and the tilt has usually made crashes deeper. Backtesting your mix with and without a small-cap slice shows the trade-off on real data.
Key terms in this guide
Plain-English definitions in the Learning Hub.
Already computed · real data
IWM vs SPY on real data
IWM grew from $10,000 to $46,911 between Jan 2007 and Oct 2026 (8.1% a year). Its worst fall was -52%, from May 2007 to Feb 2009, and it took 45 months (about 4 years) to get back to that high. SPY grew from $10,000 to $77,803 between Jan 2007 and Oct 2026 (10.9% a year). Its worst fall was -51%, from Oct 2007 to Feb 2009, and it took 53 months (about 4 years) to get back to that high.
Real 2007-01 to 2026-10 data, dividends reinvested, rebalanced yearly. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Keep watching one of them, free: IWM or SPY. A free account saves it as your plan and checks it for you every month.
For educational and informational purposes only, not financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Backtests are hypothetical; past performance does not guarantee future results.
More guides
- How to Backtest a Portfolio: A Free, Step-by-Step Guide →
- The 60/40 Portfolio: Returns, Drawdowns, and Whether It Still Works →
- How to Tell If Your Portfolio Is Actually Diversified →
- The 4% Rule, Explained: How Long Will Your Retirement Savings Last? →
- The Efficient Frontier, Explained (Without the Math Headache) →
- Lump Sum vs Dollar-Cost Averaging: What the Data Says →
- Lazy Portfolios, Explained: Simple Index Mixes That Beat Most Investors →
- How Much Do I Need to Retire? A Simple Way to Find Your Number →
- Maximum Drawdown: Why the Worst Loss Matters More Than the Average Return →
- The Sharpe Ratio, Explained: Are You Being Paid for the Risk You Take? →
- Monte Carlo Simulation, Explained: Planning for a Range of Futures →
- Stocks vs Bonds: How They Differ and How to Mix Them →
- How to Read a Stock's Fundamentals (Without an Accounting Degree) →
- Portfolio Rebalancing, Explained: Why and How to Reset Your Mix →
- VOO vs VTI: S&P 500 or Total US Market (and Does It Matter?) →
- Asset Allocation by Age: How Your Mix Should Change Over Time →
- Index Funds vs ETFs: What's the Difference and Which Should You Pick? →
- Should You Invest Internationally? Home-Country Bias, Explained →
- Dividends vs. Price Growth: Where Your Returns Really Come From →
- Risk Tolerance vs. Risk Capacity: How Much Risk Should You Actually Take? →
- Sequence-of-Returns Risk: Why the Order of Returns Can Make or Break a Retirement →
- Would Your Portfolio Have Survived 2008? How to Stress Test It →
- Factor Investing, Explained: What's Actually Driving Your Returns →
- Real vs. Nominal Returns: Why Inflation Is the Loss You Never See →
- How Much Cash Should You Hold in a Portfolio? →
- How to Invest in the S&P 500 from Canada (VFV, VOO, and Hedging) →
- Currency Risk and Hedging: Should You Hedge Your Foreign Investments? →
- Target-Date Funds Explained: Glide Paths, Fees, and the DIY Alternative →
- Total Return vs. Price Return: Why the Index Chart Understates Reality →
- Expense Ratios Explained: What a 1% Fee Really Costs You →
- Time in the Market vs. Timing the Market: What the Data Says →
- Compound Growth Explained: Why Starting Early Beats Saving More →
- How to Start Investing: A Plain-English Order of Operations →
- Bear Markets: How Deep They Go, How Long They Last, and What Recovers →
- Employer Stock and Single-Stock Concentration: How Much Is Too Much? →
- VEQT vs XEQT: Canada's All-in-One ETFs, Compared →
- RRSP vs TFSA for Investors: How to Think About the Choice →
- Seven Expensive Investing Mistakes (and the Numbers Behind Them) →
- Robo-Advisors vs. DIY Index Investing: What the Fee Buys You →
- The Average Stock Market Return (and Why You Almost Never Get It) →
- QQQ vs VOO: Higher Returns, Deeper Drops, and More Overlap Than You Think →
- The Worst Timing in History: $10,000 Invested at Every Market Peak, Measured Today →
- The Diversification That Disappears: What Your Funds Do When Stocks Crash →
- The Smith Maneuver Explained: Turning Your Mortgage Into an Investment Portfolio →
- The One-Page Investment Plan: Write Your Rules Down Before the Market Tests Them →
- Bond Duration Explained: Why "Safe" Bonds Fell 30% in 2022 →
- Should You Own Gold? What It Did in Every Crash Since 2008 →
- Do Dividend Stocks Hold Up in a Crash? SCHD, VYM and VIG Since 2008 →
- Should You Own REITs? What Real Estate Funds Did in Every Crash Since 2008 →
- Do Defensive Stocks Protect You? Staples, Health Care and Utilities in Every Crash Since 2008 →
- How Sure Is Your Success Rate? Why One Monte Carlo Number Can Mislead You →