Skip to content
Informed Portfolio logoInformed Portfolio

Head to head · real data

IWF vs IWD

Ishares Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs Ishares Russell 1000 Value ETF

Over their shared history — 2011-08 to 2026-09, about 15 years — IWF returned 19.76% a year versus 11.92% for IWD, with worst peak-to-trough falls of -29.53% and -26.72% respectively (dividends reinvested). Past performance doesn't predict future results.

IWF IWDBoth re-based to 100 at 2011-08, the start of their shared window
Metric · shared window 2011-08 – 2026-09IWFIWD
CAGR (annualized return)19.76%11.92%
Volatility (annualized)16.03%14.39%
Worst drawdown-29.53%-26.72%
Sharpe ratio1.110.74
Each fund on its own — windows differ, not directly comparable
CAGR (full own history)19.76%11.92%
Worst drawdown (full own history)-29.53%-26.73%
Data window2011-08 – 2026-092011-08 – 2026-09

Dig deeper — free, prefilled

Ticker pages: IWF · IWD

Educational use only — not investment advice. Results are hypothetical.Read full disclaimer

This tool is for educational and informational purposes only and does not provide financial, investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Results are hypothetical and based on historical data and assumptions that may be inaccurate. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consult a licensed professional before making investment decisions.

IWF vs IWD: returns, risk & which held up better · Informed Portfolio